Interview:
From 9-11, to the death of Osama bin Laden, to the Boston Bombings,
there's been a consistently bizarre and troubling reaction by some
members of the public.
We're referring to the people—a minority, to be sure, but a surprisingly
large one—who always seem to think there's some kind of cover up. The
U.S. government, they feel, was
really behind the attacks on, uh, itself. And as for Bin Laden—well, he isn't
really dead.
These people are called conspiracy theorists, and, their particular
form of irrationality is uniquely befuddling. It has been often
denounced, but rarely understood. That's too bad, because conspiratorial
thinking clearly plays an important role in science denial, on matters
ranging from the connection between HIV and AIDS, to the safety of
vaccines, to global warming.
Fortunately, conspiracy mongers are now becoming the subject of research
and study—and our latest guest is helping to lead this inquiry.
His name is
Stephan Lewandowsky, and he's a professor
at the school of psychology at the University of Western Australia, and
at the University of Bristol in the UK. And he's the author of a recent
study with the delicious title "
NASA Faked the Moon Landings, Therefore (Climate) Science is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science (PDF)"—which
drew some small amount of attention, especially when it was followed by
a second study of the conspiracy theorists who rejected the first study
for, yes, conspiratorial reasons.