"...Once the government defines marriage and attaches benefits to
that definition, it must do so constitutionally. It cannot impose a
traditional or faith-based limitation upon a public right without a
sufficient justification for it. Assigning a religious or
traditional rationale for a law, does not make it constitutional when
that law discriminates against a class of people without other reasons.
The beauty of our Constitution is that it accommodates our individual
faith’s definition of marriage while preventing the government from
unlawfully treating us differently. This is hardly surprising since it
was written by people who came to America to find both freedom of
religion and freedom from it..."
A federal judge has ruled that Kentucky must recognize same-sex marriages legally performed in other states or ... Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment