The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that: "No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Yet many state universities give substantial preferences to certain races in their admissions decisions. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court approved such preferences, but the case was close, and controversial, and the question will be back before the Supreme Court this term. One side may argue that these preferences level the playing field, remedy prior discrimination, and enhance diversity within the classroom, thus redeeming the true promise of equal protection. But the other may say that these preferences – in favor of some races, at the expense of others – are racial discrimination pure and simple, the precise evil that the Equal Protection Clause was intended to forbid.
Interview:
http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/1406-the-equal-protection-clause-forbids-racial-preferences-in-state-university-admissions
moving sign
***************************************************************
DN Speak has moved.
Click here to go to DN Speak 2016 for new posts.
***************************************************************
Featured: Interviews for the Well-Informed
Featured: Interviews for the Well-Informed
Did you know? After the last post on this page is a link to "Older posts".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment