...The plaintiffs have already been granted an overly generous way to avoid participating in a democratically enacted social program, CFI says in its brief. It points out that never before has the Supreme Court held that a requirement to seek a religious exemption constitutes a burden on religion, saying that such broad veto power over generally applicable laws sets a terrible precedent...
http://www.centerforinquiry.net/newsroom/supreme_court_must_reject_ludicrous_religious_exemptions_to_contraceptive_c/
moving sign
***************************************************************
DN Speak has moved.
Click here to go to DN Speak 2016 for new posts.
***************************************************************
Featured: Interviews for the Well-Informed
Featured: Interviews for the Well-Informed
Did you know? After the last post on this page is a link to "Older posts".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment